Page 2 of 3

Short Story – Revenge

The door of Michael’s chicken and chip shop opened. Two men walked in. There was one man at the counter.

‘What you gonna have?’ One of the men said.

‘I dunno yet,’ The other one said. ‘what are you going to have Al?’ Al ignored him. He was too busy looking at the food list above the counter. The lights were bright inside. It was about 7pm so it has gotten dark outside.

‘So,’ said Al ‘I’m going to have a chicken leg along with large chips.’

‘There are only wings left.’ The man behind the counter intruded.

‘What?’

‘There are no-‘

‘Why is it up there then?’

‘We ran out about ten minutes ago from the recent customers.’ A head poked out of the doorway leading to the kitchen. The cook knew arguments were going on. He went back round the corner of his small kitchen to stop getting involved.

‘Just give me what you have then.’ Said Al

‘Same here.’ Said Max, Staring at the counter. The two men were given a box with their food. They kept the hoods of their black coats on whilst eating.

‘What drinks do you have mate?’ Max said wiping his mouth with the back of his hand.

‘Um, Coke, Fanta, Sprite and more.’ The man replied.

‘Lucozade?’

‘What did you say?’

‘You trying to be funny? Do you have Lucozade, George?’ Max said looking at the name tag on the man’s shirt.

‘Sorry, no.’ George replied.

‘What kind of place is this!’

‘This place ain’t good enough.’ Al said. George was confused. Most people who want a drink let it pass if the place only has a certain selection of drinks. He wanted to be rude but realised it was better of trying to stay off arguments.

‘What’s that look on your face, huh?’ Max said. George quickly turned his face to look at the wall.

‘Do you think I’m stupid?’

‘No.’

‘Why you lying.’

‘I’m not.’

Max grabbed George by his shirt. ‘You’re annoying me now.’ Max said. A man in a business suit walked in. He was looking at the floor as he pushed the door open. Al turned round. ‘You better get out of here.’

‘Huh, what’s going on?’ The man looked up darting his eyes around.

‘Unless you wanna get banged, get out.’

The man slowly back stepped through the open door. He was shaking slightly. He walked round the corner until he was out of sight of Al. He reached for his phone in his back pocket. He tried to switch it on and it stayed black.

‘No, switch on!’ He said loudly. Al was about to help out Max until he heard the voice of the business man outside. He pulled open the door and took a look round the corner.

‘Ay you, I see that phone.’ Al shouted. ‘Do you think I’m that dumb, you calling the police.’

‘No I’m not, it is not what it looks like.’ The man said frightened. Al ran out towards him and snatched the out of battery phone.

‘Go home or we’ll get you later.’

The man scrambled off in the dark. Al tried to turn on his phone. The cracked screen stayed black.

‘He wasn’t lying.’ Al said. He returned to the shop. Things returned to a calmer state. Max was sitting on a chair with his arms rested on the table. He put his head down on the table.

‘Ay Al, what’s going on?’

‘Bruv, I had to make sure he didn’t call the police or something.’ Al said.

‘And?’

‘And what?’

‘Did he do it?’

‘Nah, I stopped him.’ Al said looking for the man behind the counter. ‘Where’s, um, George?’

‘He’s been dealt with.’ Max said putting away a kitchen knife.

‘Alright then, we done here?’

‘Yeah, let’s get out of this budget place.’

Max and Al walked out the chicken and chip shop. They put their hands in their pockets.

‘You going home now?’ Max said to Al.

‘Yeah sure.’

‘K, see you later bruv.’

‘Cool, see ya.’

Max went the opposite direction of Al. However he realised someone was behind him. Max went into an alleyway but still heard someone’s footsteps at the same noise level.

‘No one goes down this short cut. They’re always afraid of getting mugged or something.’ Max whispered to himself. ‘Is it the police?’ He continued to think a walk. The person behind kept a steady pace.

‘Nothing’s going to happen if I turn round anyway.’ Max thought. ‘It’s probably someone just walking home as well.’ He then acted like he saw something on the wall as he walked past it a tried to catch a glimpse of the person.

‘Damn, didn’t see it properly,’ Max raged in his head. ‘I’ll try again.’ He turned around and flicked his head back. The person was a very tall man. His hands were in his coat pockets. Max walked out of the alleyway to a silent road. His flat was across it.

‘It’s been a busy day, I wanna go bed now.’ Max said to himself whilst rubbing his eyes a bit. The man’s footsteps behind were louder and faster. Max ignored that, he was rummaging all of his pockets for keys. Accidentally he dropped a small pocket knife.

‘Didn’t want to do that dammit, where are my keys?’ he said. The tall figure tailing Max whispers to himself  ‘Good, I’ve been following the right one.’ Max paused outside the flat door to find his keys. He thought he may have dropped them and turned around to see the man crossing the road towards him.

‘You looking for something?’ The man asked.

‘Yeah, I lost my keys somewhere.’ Max said rubbing his eyes again and yawning. His vision became quite blurry. The man noticed this.

‘Are they silver? Is it this?’ The man said getting closer.

‘I think so, pass it here.’

The man held the silvery object by a handle. Max realised too slow. The metal glinted before it pierced his stomach.

‘That’s what you get for killing George.’ The man said. He then put his hands back into his pockets and walked away. Max was left on the pavement bleeding.

Theme Study 1 – Soul Eater

In this fiction book the protagonist, Torak, has lost his beloved wolf companion because he was captured by an unknown enemy. He wants Wolf back really bad as it is his pack brother. He goes on a journey with his friend in the frozen wilderness with many dangers such as blizzards and beasts. This links with the theme of ruggedness because they are trying to survive and find where Wolf is, as well as who or what captured him. The time this book is based was long ago when there were still lots of tribes. The feeling it gives is a lonesome hunter in the woods tracking down a dangerous animal. For example a big bear that has caused a lot of trouble to a nearby village.

In most stories of survival the main character would usually have something quite special about them. They possibly have a skill or supernatural ability that helps them survive. Torak is very good at tracking animals via footprints. This helps him find food or know if anything dangerous is around. I think that this book is a good example of the theme because its setting is quite classic for survival.

Is Brutus or Cassius a better leader?

 

Brutus and Cassius are great leaders in their own way. One noble and respected, the other is careful and has the intelligence. Therefore they work very well with each other but also will need one another. Otherwise Brutus is almost blindly doing what he wants without thinking of the consequences and Cassius doesn’t have enough power to get what he needs for his plans. However, which one would do better as a leader if they did not have each other or someone similar?

I think that Cassius would be the better leader. Even though he may not be one of those highly respected people straight off, he would gain respect with his pragmatic thinking. He thought through his whole plan for murdering Caesar, and for someone else to become king or convince Rome, that everything is better off not being a monarchy. It succeeded up to the convincing part. “And for Mark Antony, think not of him; for he can do no more than Caesar’s arm when Caesar’s head is off.” Brutus said and decided that it was a good idea not to kill Mark Antony as he was apparently useless without Caesar. Furthermore, he did not get the old wise Cicero, who was the best speaker alive in Rome, in the Conspiracy. Of course the others in the Conspiracy, including Cassius who disagreed with this decision, “Yet I fear him; for in the ingrafted love he bears to Caesar–” (about Antony) had to agree with Brutus to keep him on the team. This was a big mistake leading onto why Brutus isn’t a very good leader.

On the other hand, Brutus’ speaking capabilities were pretty amazing. The Conspiracy had just murdered the soon to be king Caesar, who almost everyone loved, and managed to convince Rome that it was for the good of everyone. The only reason that happened was because of Brutus. Cassius could not have done this as not as many people respected him. The reason Brutus’ speech was so convincing was because he never said that Caesar was a bad person and that he only killed him because of ambition. Ambition was a big thing in a bad way with the Romans. It was seen as putting yourself before others and quite power-hungry. You were not doing your duty. As well as that Brutus said that he killed because he loved Rome more than Caesar. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” He did it for the sake of the country. Afterwards he asked a rhetorical question “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?” Saying that who does not love their own country. This was a great finisher of his speech because everyone wants to protect their country from anything that could corrupt them in any way. Thus Brutus can be the better leader.

In the midst of the battle in Act 5 scene 3, the denouement, Cassius did not make the wisest of decisions. He had asked his slave, Pindarius, to kill him even though Brutus’ army was winning. ‘For Octavius is overthrown by noble Brutus’ power,’ Messala said. Cassius may have not died from the enemy, therefore it was a good death for Romans because he kept his honor, but he surrendered too early. A reason why he killed himself early, other than Antony’s army approaching, may have been because of when he was going to Sardis. He saw something that he interpreted was a bad omen. Two eagles fell, started feeding from the soldiers’ hands and in the morning they flew away. In replace of the eagles were ravens and crows, scavengers, that were flying along with them waiting for something to happen. The scavenger, corpse pecking birds symbolised the army’s awaiting death on the battlefield. The two eagles meant Brutus and Cassius falling as in death. Leaders should not give up too soon in a battle because their powers may lose a good reason to fight thus losing their morale. This would be a weakness in Cassius’ leadership.

Brutus went through some tough times in act 4 scene 3 which is the act of things going wrong in a tragedy. His wife killed her self by ‘swallowing fire’ (Eating hot coals) because of his absence, he argued with Cassius in the tent, and saw Caesar’s ghost. However Brutus deals with it. His wife’s suicide does not seem to effect his actions much, as well as he sorted out everything with Cassius. This is a good characteristic in a leader. Staying strong and resolving issues quickly. Even though things were ok with those two issues, seeing the ghost of Caesar could have meant he feels regret for killing his friend Caesar. Regret could make you not concentrate because you’re still hanging on to the decision you made. Was it right, or was it wrong?

In conclusion there is not really a definite answer. As you find more evidence for being a good leader in both Cassius and Brutus, it gets harder to decide. All have their strengths and weaknesses that might not always be so obvious.

Essay – Quotes

  • Brutus – O, name him not: let us not break with him;      (about Cicero)
  • Brutus –And for Mark Antony, think not of him;For he can do no more than Caesar’s armWhen Caesar’s head is off.
  • Cassius – Yet I fear him; For in the ingrafted love he bears to Caesar–
  • Cassius –  ((I will this night,
    In several hands, in at his windows throw,
    As if they came from several citizens,
    Writings all tending to the great opinion
    That Rome holds of his name))    ; wherein obscurely
    Caesar’s ambition shall be glanced at:
    And after this let Caesar seat him sure;
    For we will shake him, or worse days endure.
  • Brutus – You shall not in your funeral speech blame us,
    But speak all good you can devise of Caesar,

Essay – Introduction

Brutus and Cassius are great leaders in their own way. One noble and respected, the other is careful and has the intelligence. This means they work very well with each other but also will need one another. Otherwise Brutus is almost blindly doing what he wants without thinking of the consequences and Cassius doesn’t have enough power to get what he needs for his plans. However which one would do better as a leader if they did not have each other or someone similar?

I think that Cassius would be the better leader. He may not be one of those highly respected people straight off but he would gain his people’s respect with his pragmatic thinking. He thought through his whole plan for murdering Caesar and for someone else to become king or convince Rome that everything is better off not being a monarchy. It succeeded up to the convincing part. Brutus said and decided that it was a good idea not to kill Mark Antony as he was apparently useless without Caesar. Also he did not get the old wise Cicero, who was the best speaker alive in Rome, in the Conspiracy. Then of course the others in the Conspiracy had to agree with him to keep him on the team. This was a big mistake leading onto why Brutus still isn’t a very good leader.

Homework 1 – The Colosseum

The Colosseum is an amphitheatre built in the centre of Rome by Emperor Vespasian from 72AD – 80AD. It was then further modified by Vespasian’s son, Domitan, from 81AD- 96AD. He added tunnels underneath for slaves and animals. The reason it was called ‘the Colosseum’ was because it was built near the giant statue ‘Colossus’. It was slightly modified for a few more years after it was built. The circular building was the biggest amphitheatre in the world being 189m long and 156m wide with a height of 46m. That is a lot of materials like marble! This huge structure could hold about 50,000 spectators. It was used for many things than just gladiator fighting such as animal hunts, executions and even dramas. This building was also used for hundreds of years after it was built and was estimated to have took the lives of about 500,000 people and over a million wild animals. The Romans which attended the events were given free food such as fruit as it grew on the trees around. Since it was free people might have threw their fruit down into the middle of the Colosseum if it was a poor performance. The seating was all set out in chunks. The important people at the bottom closest to the action and the less important to the top. It would go a bit like Senators – important officials – citizens and soldiers – women and slaves. (Bottom to top) Even though so many people sat there watching, it was pretty quick to get out with 76 entrances and exits. There were so many probably because in case of emergencies. Each entrance was numbered and the spectators had tickets that said where to go. In 847 a large earthquake occurred and collapsed the southern side of the Colosseum.

 

The Wanderer Stands Alone…

I stand here alone. Watching the clouds drift by as the sun sets in the horizon. Soon it will be dark, and I have no where to go. All I do and can do is wander around aimlessly whilst observing everything carefully. It’s like some power I have. Whenever I look at something it’s like I analyse everything about it, almost like words just appear next to the object telling all info about it in front of my very eyes. It’s like not knowing how you move your body, you just somehow do it.

I don’t have a name. I don’t know who my parents are. And I have yet to find out these things. Someone probably murdered them since I can just recall some faint memories of my old village being very rough and dangerous. People were maniacs running around with no brains whilst threatening each other with weapons such as chainsaws. This mechanism must be very treacherous to others but to me not so much. No one would try to kill me. Why? No idea. The sun seems to be lowering slower than usual today. Another thing I have no answer for. I guess I should just sleep and work out what to do next other than to keep wandering around this whole world.

What is that!? A rift? Wait a minute. It just says ???. I mean that means it’s not even from this world. To see what’s through this would be amazing but clearly a stupid idea. But then again what else do I have to do with my pointless life. I’m in the middle of no where with nothing to do. Scarce on food and remaining water. Exactly 237ml remaining. I could probably survive and escape this area but what is the point when I had all the time in the world to do that yesterday. Here goes everything I guess…

The open rift instantly collapses inwards whilst ‘The Wanderer’ warps through unconscious. Then he gets spit back out into an old village. He awakes to a familiar sight. The environment is spamming him with numbers and letter in a random sequence due to his mysterious power. This Makes his  brain weak from all the ‘warping’ and is unable to cope all of it. The last sound he heard was a revving chainsaw swerving furiously about  before everything went pitch black.

 

Essay – What methods does Shakespeare use to keep the audience interested in his play Macbeth?

Shakespeare, a well known man of literature, uses many methods to keep his audience interested in his plays. A play which has many of those methods is Macbeth. For example even things like how the characters argue, fight and influence each other is a sort of method for hooking the audience interest as well as keeping them interested. There ar more of these techniques that Shakespeare uses to make his plays so good.

A technique which is used often in the play Macbeth is ‘Soliloquies’. This is when a character says his thoughts aloud to the audience. Also the person which is saying the soliloquy is usually alone with nothing else around to listen. In a way it’s like when speak to yourself so quietly, no-one can hear it. An example of this is in act 2 scene 1. Macbeth can see a dagger but it isn’t real. “Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle towards my hand?” I think that this is a part where Macbeth starts to show signs of madness and being thirsty for power – to be the king. This is happening because Lady Macbeth has convinced him so much he can see illusions. This is a soliloquy because a couple lines before the quote in the scene showed that everyone had left the room.

A technique which is used throughout the whole play of Macbeth is ‘dramatic irony’. Dramatic irony is when the audience knows something the characters may now know. An example of this is when there is a group of people plotting to do something that will lead to a disaster. Like when Lady Macbeth are plotting to commit treason. Only he two of them know about this. This technique kind of links to soliloquies because the person or people are revealing a plot to the audience with no one else around. Except soliloquies have only one person. “Look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under’t”. This is showing that Lady Macbeth is kind of saying that it will be alright as long as we cover it up and not get suspected. By flower and serpent it means that act all innocent but inside you are actually horrible and a killer. This is dramatic irony as only Macbeth, Lady Macbeth and the audience would know about this.

Dramatic irony maintains the audiences interest a lot because it may give a feeling that you want to shout out to the actors that they are going to be murdered. Also it makes the audience want to know how the plot turns out afterwards. Is it successful or not? It builds up a lot of tension which keeps everyone alert. In a way it’s like at the end if a TV show where they make some sort of climax to make you watch the next episode. For instance the main character is on the brink of death or a battle is about to commence.

Most likely one of the most important things which keeps to audience interest is simply the characters. Every story needs characters which are good, bad, trouble makers, etc. A large characteristic used in the play Macbeth is how they influence each other. Changing their thoughts, ambitions and making them a completely different person.

At the start of the play, Macbeth is quite a good, loyal soldier. He thought that king Duncan was a great man and stayed loyal to him. Then the three trouble maker witches came in. These three made a prophesy which made Macbeth have his first change of thought. Deep down, he actually wanted to become the king due to the witches telling him he would in the future. “Let not light see my dark and deep desires.” he says in one of his soliloquies. This quote shows his change of mind, It gradually gets worse and worse once he is convinced by Lady Macbeth to kill Duncan. Once he killed king Duncan, Macbeth becomes king and kind of goes on a blood rampage, killing anyone who might threat his crown. He soon does realise this but says in act 3 scene 4 “I am in blood stepp’d in so far, should I wade no more.” This explains that he has killed so many people already, why stop now? There is no going back. This keeps the audience attention because it makes them see how everything can change from a character’s influence on others.

Another thing that was mentioned a bit before is the large theme of ambition. This comes from and is very similar to the sense of influence. In the section before the changes of mind actually all links to ambition. Macbeth wanting to be king then killing all opposing him and Lady Macbeth wanting much more power. This throughout the play is like what leads the play making it more intense. Also it kind of teaches that power isn’t always the way to go and can change you a lot – but not in the right way.

A small part in Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, is how it’s written as a script. The language is thought about quite carefully when it was written. You can tell this because the words have a sort of rhythm called the iambic pentameter. It can be said and written de DUM. In a way it’s like your heartbeat. There other ways of writing it too but these are the easiest to say. (when finished, example here) There are these rhythms all the way through the play. This may answer why someone might start talking in their script and then someone else talks and their text is like all the way on the right of the page beside where the first speaker’s text ended. It can mean that the people speaking are close friends or know each other well to recognise each others rhythm easily and almost finish their sentence.  This gives off some interest to the audience because it’s quite cool to know that it’s more than just words.

Another technique used is personification. This is when an object or something abstract is treated or talked to like a real living thing like a human. For example ‘The sky weeps’. The sky can’t actually weeps but it has been ‘personified’. In Macbeth an example for this is in act 2 scene 1 where he sees an imaginary dagger. “The handle towards my hand? Let me clutch thee… Thou mashall’st me the way I was going.”

 

This is Your Online Domain

Hello and welcome to your personal online journal.

Edutronic has been created to enhance and enrich your learning at the London Nautical School. Its purpose is to provide you with an audience for your work (or work-in-progress) and you have the choice (by altering the ‘visibility’ of your posts) of whether your work on here is visible to the world, or only to your teacher.

Anything you post here in the public domain represents you and thus it’s important that you take care with that decision, but don’t be afraid to publish your work – as the feedback you may get from people at home, your peers and people from around the internet is only likely to enhance it.

Remember you can always access your class blog and all manner of resources through the Edutronic main website – and by all means check out the sites of your peers to see what they’re getting up to as well.

If you have any questions for your teacher, an excellent way to get an answer is to create a new private post on this journal. Your teachers are am notified of any new posts and will reply swiftly to any queries.

Make the most of, and enjoy this new freedom in your English learning!